Allocutio: The “What,” the “Why,” and the “Who” of Legionary Obedience

Dog obedient

Southern American poet Archibald Rutledge wrote that one day he met a man whose dog had just been killed in a forest fire. Heartbroken, the man explained how it happened. Because he worked outdoors, the man often took his dog with him. That morning, he left the animal in a clearing and gave him a command to stay and watch his lunch bucket while he went into the forest. His faithful friend understood and did exactly that. Then a fire started in the woods, and soon the blaze spread to the spot where the dog had been left. But the dog did not move. He stayed right where his master had said, in perfect obedience. With tearful eyes, the dog’s owner said, “I always had to be careful what I told him to do, because I knew he would do it.”

The inspiring loyalty and obedience of a dog – who did what he was told to do and who was faithful to duty, no matter what – opens our consideration today on the meaning of, the rationale behind, and the role model for the practice of obedience in the Legion.  In other words, I would to reflect today on the “what,” the “why,” and the “who” of Legionary obedience.

Regarding the “what” or the meaning of obedience, the Handbook defines this virtue as the “fruit of loyalty” and the “readiness to accept situations and decisions” (H, 171) linked to our Legion life with its double demand: submission not just with our bodies, but also with our hearts.  This means that members, in a “spirit of heroic and sweet docility to proper authority of every sort” (H, 171), must physically do what the Legion system, the Legion Handbook, and the Legion officers ask.  At the same time, they must also “accept [all of it] cheerfully” (H, 171).  And this means more than a grudging adherence or a “going through the motions” in embracing duty, but engaging everything – even that which one may not like or agree – with joy and without the least evidence of attitudes, such as “I don’t like this” or “I don’t agree with this” or “I am only doing this because I have to.”  We must obey with love!

After giving the “what,” the Handbook goes on to indirectly treat the “why” of obedience.  And it does so by appealing to the image of an army and raising the issue of unity.   How effective would a military force be without obedience?  What chaos would result if each soldier did what he or she wanted, acted individually, and only followed the commands he or she liked?  What kind of strategy could be executed if a percentage, feeling they knew better than the officers, decided to try their own plan of attack?  The campaign would end in absolute disaster, and lives would inevitably be lost.  The point and the warning in enlisting this military metaphor is that similar results await the Legion if each member takes any other approach than obedience:  lives – souls – precious to Jesus and Mary could sadly be lost because members did not “attack” in unison, abiding by Legion discipline.  And this is something the Legion and the Christian cannot afford.

Lastly, there is the “who” of obedience or identifying a role model of living out this virtue.  Several years ago, Fr. Bede McGregor, spiritual director of the Concilium Legionis, gave a beautiful allocutio on Mary’s Fiat at the Annunciation.  In it, he remarked that “[The Holy Trinity] built salvation, not only on [Mary’s] body, but on her will, as well.”   Fr. McGregor’s words remind us that Mary is the model of the Legion’s doubly-demanding obedience.  After all, she not only gave God her body as “the handmaid of the Lord” (Lk 1:38), but she also gave Him her heart when she declared “let it be done to me according to your word” (Lk 1:38).  In this, Mary becomes our Legion template in “doing whatever Jesus tells us” (cf. John 2:5).  Just as Mary physically carried out the Lord’s plan AND did whatever was asked of her with a spirit that “rejoiced in God, [her] Savior” (Luke 1:46), so should we.

Legion members, that is the “what,” the “why,” and the “who” of Legionary obedience.  How well are we living this?  Do we do what we are asked – by the Handbook, by the Officers, by the Church by the Spiritual Director?  Are we doing it all with loving, joyful acceptance – which means without complaint, comment, or compromise?  We may not always like our assignments, we may not always agree with the list of approved Legion works, we may not always find the Legion system palatable in parts, and we may not always understand a certain teaching or caution on the part of the Magisterium.  We may even think that “we know better” and give into the temptation to start doing things our own way, believing it does not matter.  But it does matter.  For the same rationale that justifies disobedience in small things will soon justify disobedience in larger things.  That will only lead to disobedience in all things … and disarray in our fight for souls!

I want to conclude today with the words spoken by St. Padre Pio on this very topic:   “Where there is no obedience, there is no virtue.  Where there is no virtue, there is no good.  Where good is wanting, there is no love, there is no God.  And where God is not, there is no Heaven.”  And, friends, from what we know of the Handbook, where “obedience is not,” neither will the Legion be!  May obedience – our “dogged” fidelity to what the Legion asks us to do – be the cement that keeps our Legion edifice standing and strong!

Philadelphia Senatus, Rev. Frank Giuffre

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Reading: Handbook, Chapter 29/”Legionary Loyalty”

Posted in News | Comments Off on Allocutio: The “What,” the “Why,” and the “Who” of Legionary Obedience

Allocutio: Facing Our “Impossible Dreams” in the Legion Spirit

Image result for man of la mancha pictures

The Man of La Mancha had his “impossible dreams.”  (“The Impossible Dream” [The Quest] is the name of the famed song from that musical.)  We, as Legion members, come face to face with our “impossible dreams,” too: feeling the desire to see some good accomplished, yet experiencing frustration because every attempt to make that good materialize has failed –with little or no hope of success remaining.  Consider these examples.  I want to convert a faithful Muslim, but he has told me that he will never, ever, ever consider becoming a Christian.  I have tried to bring a person in an invalid marriage back to the Church, but the woman has made it clear that she does not want an annulment or the Church’s sacraments again – period.  I would like to invite the eighty percent of my Parish who have “fallen away” back to Sunday Mass, but I am only one person.  I want to have a recruiting drive for active Legion members at my church, yet the last five have yielded absolutely no interest at all.

The Legion Handbook among its “Cardinal Points” in chapter 39, part four (on “Symbolic Action”), acknowledges the reality of such “impossible dreams” and, more importantly, gives members insight as to how they should be understood and approached.  Two particular points raised in that section are worthy of our consideration.  Firstly, the Handbook asks us to be careful about labeling any situation “impossible,” remembering that nothing is beyond God’s power to accomplish.  Certainly, we have enough proof from the Bible to support such a belief.  There we read on page after page about the incredible feats God was able to perform in history: like getting Israel through the Red Sea (Exodus 14), like bringing a dead boy, laid out for his funeral, back to life (Luke 7), and like Jesus raising Himself from the dead by His power as God (Luke 24).  Each of these instances certainly involved people who thought were in an “impossible” situation:  the Hebrew people, trapped against a body of water and with the Egyptian army in hot pursuit; the widow of Nain ready to bury the son she herself had seen die; and the disciples of Jesus knowing that His body had been in the tomb three days and surely must be decaying.  They likely thought to themselves, “There’s no way out of this one. It’s humanly impossible.”  But did they not learn soon enough that what was impossible for human beings was not impossible for God?   These and the other miracles in the Bible remind us how powerful our God is.  The Handbook is only asking us in the Legion not to forget that this same God is ours.  Since He is, then how could we ever apply the adjective “impossible” to any situation we face?

The second point is equally critical.  Remembering that we have a God who can do the impossible, we must never fail to give God the opportunity to act marvelously by giving up on any situation.  That is what we do when we walk away from the stubborn person, the difficult case, or any other challenging situation: we deprive God of the material to work His miracles!  Think about it: In the Gospels, it was only because the apostles brought forward five loaves and two fish – and did so knowing that it was insufficient for feeding a crowd of such a size – that the Lord was able to multiply that meagre food and make it more than enough to satisfy at least 5000 people (John 6).  In addition, it was only because Mary insisted that the waiters at the wedding feast of Cana fill those jars with water – and to do so, even though she had just been told by Jesus that “His hour had not yet come” – that water was able to become the best of wine and save the celebration (John 2).  When we persevere in our toughest cases, we are giving Jesus “the bread and fish” and “the water” for making a miracle again happen in that instance.  We are giving God the chance, as the Handbook remarks, to “explode the impossibility which is of our own imagining” (H, 287).

St. Francis of Assisi, commenting on the facing of incredible challenges, once counseled, “Start by doing what’s necessary; then [continue by doing] what’s possible; and suddenly you [find yourself] doing the impossible!”  That is the spirit with which Legionaries should approach their “impossible dreams.”  We must rally ourselves never to give up on any given situation, remembering, as St. Gabriel the Archangel said to Mary, “Nothing is impossible for God” (Luke 1:37).  And because of this, nothing should be impossible for a legionary who believes, either.

19 February, 2017: Rev. Frank Giuffre/Philadelphia Senatus

Reading: Handbook, pp. 285-286 [Chapter 39, Section 4/”Symbolic Action”]

Posted in News | Comments Off on Allocutio: Facing Our “Impossible Dreams” in the Legion Spirit

Allocutio: Legion Effort – Not for Results, but for our Lady

mother-and-child-jesus

The late Steve Jobs, the American inventor, technical designer, and co-founder of the highly successful Apple, Inc., once remarked that, when it comes to success in business, “It’s not about charisma and personality, it’s about results and products” that get people excited about one’s company, what it stands for, and what it can contribute to the industry.

While results might be almost everything in the business world, it is definitely not true in the Legion’s world.  As the Handbook states: “… legionaries must be brought to realize that they do not work directly for results.  They work for Mary, quite irrespectively of the simplicity or difficulty of the task” (H, 35).   Because the member does not work for tangible results, he or she must refrain from the natural tendency to judge the “success” or “failure” of activity based upon witnessing them.  Instead, the legionary must realize that, in spite of one’s best efforts and most loyal service, the fruits of his or her loyal labors will not always be seen immediately – if ever – in this life.  In addition, the member does not realize the many marvelous, yet secret ways the Lord and His Mother could use what was done for the benefit of a soul, even over the long haul.

Perhaps after a long day at the book barrow, not one substantial interaction with a passerby on the Catholic Faith has transpired.  Yet, little do we know that someone walking by – someone we never engaged in conversation – saw the crucifix on the front of a pamphlet in the barrow, was struck with sorrow for his or her sins, and made a good confession later that day.  Perhaps after hours doing door to door evangelization and inviting the “fallen away” back to Sunday Mass at the parish, nothing but scorn has been experienced.  Yet little do we realize that one individual who slammed the door in our face after a brief interchange later thought it all over and decided to contact the local parish about returning.  Perhaps we have spent hours in a hospital visiting the sick, distributing holy cards, and praying with patients, yet no interest was encountered.  Yet little do we know that one person to whom we gave a holy card, in a moment of crisis, grasped it with an act of contrition that brought him mercy in the end.  We get it.  There are a thousand ways the Lord may choose to use our faithful Legion service:  Not all of them involve our seeing it happen or witnessing results!

Legion members should strive to adopt the mindset of St. Teresa of Calcutta.  This remarkable woman served the poorest of the poor in India, working strenuously, hour after hour, spending all she had to bring relief to Christ suffering in her midst.  Mother Teresa likely ended many days without seeing the fantastic results of her labors.  Many of those cared for died.  Numbers of those loved failed to convert.  Dozens encountered never received medical treatment because of a lack of resources.  Yet Mother did not consider herself a failure or give up her mission. After all, she did not judge her life and define success based on results, but on obedience to the divine will – summed up in that now famous phrase, “God has not called me to be successful; He has called me to be faithful.”  Hers was the joy of the “useless servants” described by Jesus in the Gospel:  Mother Teresa felt herself blessed simply at “having done only what she was asked to do” (Luke 17:10).  It was the service that mattered most, not the results.  Legion members, it must be so for us.

The saying goes that “success is a journey, not a destination.”  Success typically unfolds over time and rarely in an instant.  So, Legionaries must be content with and humbly accept the fact that their work on many days may only take people a few more inches along the road of faith.  And they must have enough trust that Mary will walk them the remainder of the way to Her Son.

15 January 2017: Rev. Frank Giuffre/Philadelphia Senatus

Reading: Handbook, pp. 35-36 [Chapter 6, Section 4]

Posted in Allocutio | Comments Off on Allocutio: Legion Effort – Not for Results, but for our Lady

Marian Day Invitation

Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary – Legion of Mary: Mary, Mother of the Blessed Sacrament Praesidium invites you to the 24th Annual 

Marian Day.

Fr Mark Mary ProfilePic

Speaker:  Rev. Fr. Mark Mary MFVA from EWTN – host of “Life on the Rock”

 

Theme:  Mary’s Spiritual Motherhood

 

When: Saturday, March 11, 2017     9 am – 4 pm

Schedule:

9am – Registration

9:30 – conference one– Fr. Mark Mary

11:15 – Holy Sacrifice of the Mass

12:00pm – Lunch

1:15 – conference two – Fr. Mark Mary

2:45 – Holy Hour

Please RSVP before March 1st  at advancement@scs.edu or 610.785.6270 indicating your name and the number of persons attending with you. A donation of $10 to cover box lunch is requested of lay attendees at the time of registration. Please note: due to scheduling, breakfast and other snacks will not be provided.

Click Here to download Marian Day Poster

Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary

100 E Wynnewood Road * Wynnewood, PA 19096

www.scs.edu

Posted in News | Comments Off on Marian Day Invitation

Allocutio – Taking the “Accompanying” Line by Rev. Frank Giuffre

 

Legion Members: Taking the “Accompanying” Line
20 November 2016: Rev. Frank Giuffre/Philadelphia Senatus
Reading: Handbook, pp. 312-313 [Chapter 40, Section 3, “No! … religion to us!”]

holding-hands-picture
Contemporary Catholic speaker, writer, and evangelist Matthew Kelly often speaks
about his conversion from being a lukewarm Catholic, a fallen away of the Church, to a
dynamic Catholic, a passionate disciple of the Church. We might ask ourselves what made
all the difference and what served to precipitate the change in Kelly’s life. Was it a sermon he heard? A book he read? A Mass he attended? A shrine he visited? It was none of these.

It was rather the intervention of a faith-filled friend who loved Kelly enough to tell him the truth and who also loved him enough to keep in regular contact with Kelly over the long haul, walking him back to the Faith and working with him on deepening his faith. Like a doctor who prescribes to the physically infirm differing dosages of various medicines with each check-up, so this friend counseled Kelly back to spiritual health through continued contact as to the right prayers and practices needed at the right time – first challenging Kelly to stop in a church, then later to read the Gospels, then later to perform a work of mercy regularly (visiting a nursing home), and then later to pray the Rosary daily.

Describing the power this sustained influence had on him, Kelly would say, “[Without the guidance of my friend], I couldn’t have done what I did with my life.”
Kelly’s story and testimony highlights a lesson for Legion members in their effort of
“seeking conversions to the Church.” Definitely, it attests how essential the personal contact of “one soul upon another” (H, 314) is in the approach. But it also reminds us that something more is needed: not one personal contact, but sustained personal contacts, whereby one caring Christian helps a soul over the long haul, guiding him or her step by step along the journey to Christ and to the Church. Such a sustained contact and interaction coalesces with Legion mentality. After all, while the Handbook asserts that the most effective approach in the realm of conversions “must be an individual and intimate one” (H, 312), nowhere does it say that it should be a limited to one – that is, limited to one visit, one conversation, one meeting.
The Legion knows that what is needed for the individual’s spiritual healing is what was
employed for the paralytic’s total healing in Mark 2:1-10. We may recall in that scene how a totally helpless, handicapped man was brought to Jesus – through a packed crowd and a solid roof – by friends who were willing to make the long journey and difficult investment of their energy to see a comrade of theirs made well again. Legion members are called to use the same tactic: to carry those seeking conversion on the “stretcher” of regular visits and interactions, never swayed by obstacles, until these souls finally are led to a life-saving and life-altering encounter with Jesus. This kind of effort will be demanding. It may entail spending a lot of time, experiencing a lot of frustration, seeing very little progress on some days, and wanting to give up on others. But in many cases, it may just be the only hope for one who, like the paralyzed man, would have no other way of reaching Jesus. A Legion friend is needed to see them through!
Pope Francis has made a priority of promoting this approach when speaking on the
topic of evangelization, using the phrase “accompaniment” to describe the process by which believer walks with a potential-believer all the long journey (back) to the Church. He challenges us “to [be] a Church at the side of others, capable of accompanying everyone along the way” (Message, June 1, 2014) with “prudence, understanding, patience and docility to the Spirit” (EG, 171). The Holy Father’s wisdom is marching orders for the Legion that, in assisting those who would convert to the Catholic Faith, we must take, not the company line, but the accompanying line. We must be willing to befriend “broken down” AND journey with those “broken down” the entire way home – and not be content with a single instance of “roadside, emergency service.”

Posted in News | Comments Off on Allocutio – Taking the “Accompanying” Line by Rev. Frank Giuffre

Allocutio – Embracing our Legion “Lepers”

st_francis_leper

16 October, 2016: Rev. Frank Giuffre/Philadelphia Senatus

Reading: Handbook, p. 15 (Chapter 4, Section 4: “Must ‘live in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us’.”)

Most of us have probably heard of the story of St. Francis who was one day walking the roads and came upon a repulsive-looking leper, full of rot and sores.  Francis, horrified by the sight, was tempted to run away in utter disgust.  But catching himself, he turned instead and ran up to embrace this unfortunate man, seeing the image of Christ behind the disfigurement and stench.

If we are honest enough to admit it, we have our own “lepers” in this life.  We may even run into them daily.  They can be various people we just do not “care for.”  But they can also be situations we despise, duties we prefer to avoid, or places we honestly abhor entering.  Yet, as this story of St. Francis reminds us, it is precisely in these faces, places, and spaces of time that we will likely encounter the person of Christ who never promised a meeting only in the best of conditions, but did in fact say He would be found in “the least of [His] brethren” (Mt 25:40) – and that means among the most unfortunate of people and circumstances.  Therefore to “run” from them equates to running from Him.

Our Handbook reading today reminds us that real love “must be more than appearances,” but a “readiness to give oneself entirely” (H, 15).  And we do not “give ourselves entirely” when some person, some situation, some assignment, or some location is considered “off limits” in our practice and service.  Legion members must be willing to lay aside selfish preferences and concerns when the good or salvation of a soul is at stake.  They must embrace and not race from the challenging.  They must not draw “lines in the sand” which indicate how far they are willing to go.  Instead the legionary must be willing to venture forth to whomever and wherever they are drawn by the Holy Spirit and the Holy Mother of God, letting nothing stand in the way.  Only those of such generous love and service will do “really fruitful work” (H, 15) for souls and realize the aim specified in our “Standing Instructions”: to “see and serve the person of Jesus Christ” (H, 109) – and to do so wherever He chooses to appear, not just where we want Him to appear!

Today, I would like to ask each of us to consider who – or rather – what is our Legion “leper?”  Which are the works of the Legion, who are the objects of Legion love, and what are the Legion assignments that we avoid, refuse to accept, fail to include among the apostolates of our praesidia, and ultimately flee from?  Maybe it is “doing the difficult work” of evangelization.  Maybe it is visiting a nursing home or hospital.  Maybe it is making the effort at extension.  Maybe it’s organizing a junior praesidium.  Maybe it’s having to do crowd contact.  Maybe it’s spiritually assisting individuals of a certain race, economic class, or age.  If we want real change in the Legion, if we want to grow the Legion, and if we want to be more effective in our mission in the Legion, we must identify these lepers and – here’s the tough part – we must embrace these lepers with joy and resolve, rather than run from them. These lepers show us where our Legion love needs to deepen and how we can give of ourselves more generously in the service of Jesus and Mary, extending our reach in our work for souls.

The great mystic, St. Gertrude, had many visions of our Lord.  One of these happened during “Mardi Gras.”  St. Gertrude begged Our Lord to tell her how she could be of some service to Him then so as to make up for the sins committed during those decadent days before the start of Lent.  Our Lord answered: “My daughter, you will never do me a greater service than that of patiently bearing, in memory of My Passion, whatever tribulation befalls you, whether internal or external, and of always trying to do those things which are most contrary to your desires” (emphasis added).  If we in the Legion really want to make Our Lord happy, why not fulfill His own wishes?  Why not face squarely what we find “contrary to our desires” in the Legion?  For it will likely be that, in embracing those “Legion lepers,” we will almost surely embrace of our Legion Lord.

Posted in News | Tagged | Comments Off on Allocutio – Embracing our Legion “Lepers”